I type better than I talk, figured I’d say this here for this reason.

I honestly feel like, given the overwhelming, unnecessary and avoidable stressfulness of the environment that people may feel justified concluding that I exhibit paranoia.

I’m not paranoid. I’m cautious. I live where I work. This is not my personal environment where I never do anything to harm any living thing whatsoever.

So you understood this one time when we were talking, that there is no place to go.

So it’s like, “okay, since this is reality that cannot be manipulated by me merely making a choice to change it, let’s at least try to make it as peaceful as possible by influencing – positively – those around us.”

Am I doing something wrong here with this line of thinking, humans? If yes, explain …

Remember, I was frustratingly blessed with an alarming, at least to me, red light from the very beginning.

I knew NOTHING about this person. To my knowledge, they’d been there less than a week.

Reminder again, this is where we live.

Imagine if you were done with negative, hateful, bigoted, judgmental, generally angry people, ya know, all the characteristics contained in the exact opposite of the most peaceful world possible. You’d had enough and coincidentally – and obviously – it never came in any non-human form. Ever. Guaranteed.

Thus, the only choice left if overcome by people with negative natures is to leave the shared non-human parts of the environment(s). Even if there are many just like you. Your “self” exists and is surrounded by so much more that is not you.

Nature is perfect and flawless and understandable and balanced; humans are fucked. up. Animals and plants and water aren’t deliberately harming us; they probably have no “idea” what they’re doing, but you know what? they respond positively to positive treatment.

And sometimes that means no treatment at all. Ya know like when we wipe entire species of animals out of existence – for sport.

And further guessings of what? almost all individual humans also respond positively to a positive choice. animals cannot negotiate with us in any useful medium to defend their own lives and their own peaceful environments.

But individual humans can. That is why it is always a choice for us – how shall I treat the people around me?

This is simply not how people think and act. And some of them simply will not or cannot change.

I know you’re going to try to argue otherwise because you’ve discovered a new kind of optimism and hope that I swear I long for, but evidence just supports my side more – this is a hopeless species, destructive as individuals and groups.

I know that the majority of us are able, we just aren’t willing. To make better choices. We’re too busy seeing ourselves as individuals. Nobody is arguing there is no such thing, but rather that such things are trivial in regards to shared environments.

Here’s a question – can the damage be turned around on a realistic timeline, in which mandates by a government would require a simultaneous and equal change in entire cultural paradigms, while we are breeding 120 million + people every year?

I’d like someone to show me what the exact human population size the earth can contain, since it obviously has a limit as there exists, at least to my knowledge, no evidence to show that the earth would also grow in size to accommodate, which would be necessary.

I have an appointment in the morning, I’m going to sleep. I expect an equally long and winding response en la pantalla en la mañana.